Review: Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II VC LD Aspherical [IF]

By Betsy Finn, CPP

Tamron’s 17-50mm f/2.8 lens has a minimum focus of 11.4 inches (0.29 m) over the zoom range, with macro capability to 1:4.8. Equipped with Tamron’s proprietary Vibration Compensation (VC) image stabilization mechanism, the 17-50mm allows photographers to capture hand-held images in low-light conditions (up to 4-stops more than without VC).


©Betsy Finn

Since the 17-50mm lens is a Di-II lens (designed for use on APS-C size imaging sensors), you will need to multiply the focal length by a factor 1.56 to get the full frame equivalent (26-78mm). This also means that when the lens is used with a full frame sensor, you will see vignetting (since it was designed for a smaller sensor size). My Nikon D3 SLR automatically compensates for this limitation by “graying out” that part of the viewfinder. Through some clever photographing, I was able to capture the view through the viewfinder so you can see what it looks like:


©Betsy Finn

The focal length range on the 17-50mm lens does lend itself to flexibility. While traveling throughout Tennessee for a speaking engagement, I actually photographed exclusively with the Tamron 17-50mm lens.


Both images were exposed at 1/160 sec at f/4.5, ISO 640. The 17mm (x1.56 = 78mm equivalent ) exposure is on the left, and the 50mm (x1.56 = 26mm equivalent) exposure is on the right. ©Betsy Finn

While on my trip, I also stopped at a world-famous barbeque restaurant. Yes, I did photograph my meal. The Tamron 17-50mm did a nice job of capturing my pulled pork sandwich while letting the busy background fall out of focus.


This image was taken at 17mm (x1.56 = 78mm equivalent),
with an exposure of 1/125 second at f/4, ISO 400. ©Betsy Finn

To test the VC feature (image stabilization), I first photographed my cat. Incidentally, this also pushed the minimum focus distance … as he was curious about the Tamron lens, too! I had the focus set on manual for this exposure, and positioned the camera as close to the cat as possible. Notice how his eyes are in focus, but his nose falls out of focus because it is too close.


This image was taken at ISO 3200 at a focal length of 19mm (x1.56 = 19mm equivalent). The exposure was 1/40 second at f/4, handheld (VC enabled). ©Betsy Finn

This next comparison should give you a better sense of the effectiveness of the lens’s image stabilization mechanism. First, the “full” image:


And below is a close-up comparison: both were hand-held, same settings, except one had VC turned on. Can you guess which? And just so you know, I do consider myself to have a pretty steady hand when it comes to hand-holding at slow exposures. So it was definitely interesting to see these results—I’m convinced!

200912we_tamron-no-vc-closeup.jpg 200912we_tamron-vc-closeup.jpg

Handheld at ISO 200. The exposure was 1/6 sec at f/6.3 at 50mm (x1.5 = 78mm equivalent). Image on left has VC disabled; image on right has VC enabled. ©Betsy Finn

This full-featured 17-50mm lens weighs in at 21.15 ounces (570 g), and is available with lens mounts for both Canon and Nikon (with built-in AF motor). I was impressed at how lightweight the lens was, especially considering the VC feature. The 17-50mm retails for $649, and features a zoom lock, an auto/manual focus switch, and includes the flower-shaped lens hood. For more detailed specifications, see below (click for large view):


Betsy Finn, CPP, is a photographic artist and a PPA Councilor (’09-’12). Her educational website for photographers is


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (7)

What kind of auto focus motor does this lens use? Standard or ultrasonic?

Good question! I just checked, and the motor in the lens is a standard DC motor.

Thanks for the reply!

Not to sound like an idiot, but what is an ultrasonic motor?

Not sure how it works, but in practice it is a faster and more quiet type of autofocus motor.

H.H. :

Very helpfull review. Many thanks. Any differences between Nikon version and Canon version, except for the mounting? I am looking for a Canon version.

I only tested the Nikon mount -- so I can't say from firsthand experience. I would think that the lens performance should be similar from Nikon version to Canon version though.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 1, 2009 11:11 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Review: EzMats Designer.

The next post in this blog is Review: Serif MoviePlus X3.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 5.2.7